Pursuit & Capture
Interrogate the opportunity, customer environment, evaluation logic, capture assumptions and strategic position before resources and commitments become difficult to reverse.
From pursuit to price to proposal to executive decision.
Supporting government contractors across the procurement lifecycle through capture intelligence, competitive analysis, Black Hat, Price-to-Win, pricing strategy and governed decision analysis. The work is underpinned by the Decision Integrity System™.
Specialist analytical support across the pursuit lifecycle, from opportunity assessment through competitive position, price, proposal and executive decision.
Interrogate the opportunity, customer environment, evaluation logic, capture assumptions and strategic position before resources and commitments become difficult to reverse.
Analyse competitors, incumbents, likely positioning, teaming, evaluator interpretation and hidden assumptions through evidence-led competitive and adversarial analysis.
Develop defensible Price-to-Win and pricing positions using competitive intelligence, labour and cost analysis, commercial constraints and scenario-based pricing logic.
Test whether the proposal, pricing logic and capture narrative are coherent, defensible and likely to be interpreted by evaluators as intended.
Structure evidence, assumptions, inference, risk, missing information and decision gates so executives can see what supports the pursuit and what remains exposed.
Apply governed AI-assisted and agentic analytical workflows where they increase speed and analytical depth while retaining evidence provenance, human review and accountability.
The Decision Integrity System™ (DIS™) is a governed analytical system developed by Ayse Ebru Douglas for E.A. Douglas Consulting. It operates across the procurement decision lifecycle, structuring evidence, assumptions, competitive intelligence, pricing logic, risk, challenge and executive judgement before commitment is made.
Specialist analytical functions are applied according to the decision problem and stage of the pursuit rather than as disconnected tools. The objective is not simply more analysis. It is to determine whether the decision can withstand evaluation, audit and execution.
Explore Decision IntegrityAnalytical output is not treated as self-validating. Major pursuit questions are subjected to experienced practitioner challenge across capture, competitive positioning, pricing, proposal logic and evaluator interpretation.
This creates an additional layer between analytical output and executive commitment: evidence is tested, assumptions are challenged, commercial logic is reviewed and the resulting decision remains subject to accountable human judgement.
Why coherent narratives, sophisticated models and executive confidence are not the same as a decision that can withstand scrutiny.
Read foundationWhy modern organisations can reveal strategic structure without disclosing protected information — and why reconstruction changes the governance problem.
Read essayA successful result does not prove that the reasoning was sound. A poor result does not prove that the decision was poor.
Read noteExecutive decision architect and founder of E.A. Douglas Consulting. Her work operates at the intersection of government contracting, competitive intelligence, strategic pricing, decision governance and emerging AI capability.
She developed the Decision Integrity System™ to make consequential decisions more visible, testable and defensible across the analytical lifecycle rather than allowing evidence, assumptions, risk and judgement to disappear inside the final recommendation.
E.A. Douglas Consulting can augment an existing capture team or provide a focused external analytical workstream across competitive intelligence, Black Hat, Price-to-Win support, pricing, proposal challenge and executive decision governance.
Initial conversations are confidential and focused on determining where additional analytical depth, independent challenge or specialist capability can materially improve the pursuit.